Wednesday, 27 February 2013

Retirement Calculators - How Much Money Do You Need?


It is no simple matter to estimate one's financial needs in retirement. One point of departure is to use retirement calculators.

Here are a few:

The Investor Education Fund, a not-for-profit entity established by the Ontario Securities Commission, offers a retirement cash flow calculator. (The site provides many other useful tools.)

The user friendly calculator progresses logically through the following steps:
  • planning dates (time to retirement)
  • budgeting during retirement (income, expenses)
  • investment returns (RRSPs, TFSAs, non-registered investments) plus assumptions for inflation and annual rates of return
  • major financial events (major specific sources of income e.g. house sale and expenditures e.g. condo purchase)
  • summary results (how long your stash will last you)
Service Canada offers a useful calculator tailored to project retirement planning for Canadians.

This online service will provide you with retirement income information, including OAS and CPP benefits. You will need to work through a series of modules in order to estimate your retirement incomes and compare them to the 70% income replacement rate often recommended by retirement planners. It also allows you to see the impact of increased savings. The calculator will help you better understand how each level of the retirement income system will contribute to your future financial security. The calculator's results are rough estimates for information purposes only - not financial planning. The calculator does not collect personal information or identifiers.

CNN Money provides a good calculator for Americans – useful also for Canadians.

The value of retirement calculators is that they "set the table for further discussion".  Given that entitlement programs are likely to come under further pressure as governements attempt to cope with unremitting deficits, it is even more important to forgo some pleasures of the day in order to stash away some resources for the future.  My wife and I lived off one salary for about seven years when we started out ... and we banked the other salary.  We did not suffer a reduction in the quality of life and the strategy provided us with a smorgasbord of life options.   


Life Expectancy - How Long Could You Live?

Since the results vary widely, it make sense to run several calculators.  Here's a good one from the Population Health Improvement Research Network (PHIRN):

I like the following calculator.   It is comprehensive and provides a brief analysis of risk factors.  Unlike some calculators which must have been sponsored by the Taliban, this one lauds the intake of 2 to 3 drinks each day ... my kind of calculator.


Friday, 22 February 2013

Lessons Learned From Gains



As part of my recent portfolio review, I investigated the circumstances around winning investments. Here are some of my findings. 

Anticipating a Long-Term Trend and Drilling Down to Find the Best Prospects

By far and away, this approach led to my most rewarding gains.  It is the result of extensive reading.  I consult a variety of sources ranging from trade journals, local/regional news outlets, government statistical reports, think tanks and the like. I have NEVER found initial “hints” in the financial press.

Once an emerging trend has been identified, it usually takes a few years to develop a strategy to exploit it. For example, with agriculture, I read for three years before I felt comfortable with committing to a program of investing in specific sectors. There were many false starts.  The process is still evolving, especially in the area of agricultural logistics in South America.

In early 2003 I started to look at precious metals with the thought they would get traction as “safe haven” investments, especially given the proclivity of the media to celebrate turmoil throughout the world ... if it bleeds, it leads.

I started to learn all I could about gold and silver mining and developed a “mental model” which encompassed various facets of the industry. It was then a matter of investigating potential investments in explorers, juniors, intermediates, and major producers as well as bullion. (I never did get to the point of investigating services and equipment companies.) As soon as Silver Wheaton came on the horizon, I looked hard, liked the concept, and established a core position at under $4 per share in 2005.  Ditto for the Central Fund of Canada (2003, $6.65).   I decided to speculate in exploration and junior companies and got lucky as some of them were bought out by majors looking to replenish/expand their reserves. In looking back last week, I barely recognized some of the company names I had purchased even though some of the gains had been significant.

As you can see from the gold chart  http://www.kitco.com/charts/livegold.html some of the periodic declines in the price of gold over the past decade were rather heart stopping. Nevertheless, I held on to my core positions, and will continue to do so until I see a fundamental change in underlying conditions viz the continuing threat of financial instability and inflation; loss of faith in fiat currencies, continued uptake of precious metals by residents of newly affluent nations with cultural attitudes favouring gold; greater sensitivity of the public to unforeseen or tumultuous events.

I ended my forays into exploration, junior and intermediate producers once financing became a challenge for them. It was a fundamental game changer, but not one which has affected bullion and royalty-based companies such as Silver Wheaton. They are pure plays on financial insecurity – something which still prevails as a chronic condition on the world stage.

I figure that the need to refurbish and rebuild our infrastructure is a very significant trend. The power grid is essential to our well-being. Ditto for bridges. Ditto for the movement of goods: pipelines, rail cars. Manufacturers, engineering companies, and materials suppliers have been added to the Financial Log Book. There is not much likelihood that foreign companies with offshore operations will impede domestic companies for a variety of reasons. There is every indication that patience will be rewarded, especially as the companies have excellent financials and astute management.

The Lesson

  • Read voraciously and develop a “view” about major trends and the potential for investments.
  • Develop a mental model to characterize potential investment themes as a framework for more detailed investigation.
  • Drill down to identify and assess specific companies for investment.
  • Manage risk taking into account the size of companies, their volatility ... and make sure that you invest only in companies with experienced management with a successful track record.
  • Don't be deterred by fluctuations in price as major trends will ultimately trump short-term market sentiment.
  • Be vigilant about potential changes in trends as they generally insinuate themselves quietly but with deadly results – something like cancer.
  • Do take profits, especially if you have the opportunity to diversify your portfolio with other promising investments (but don't diversify for the sake of diversification ... a mug's game) ... and it's always nice to reward yourself or favoured others with treats.

Good Companies Satisfying Enduring Needs

Warren Buffet has profited mightily by investing in companies of this nature. With the experience of owning positions in companies such as Saputo, Northwest Company, Nestle, and the like I have started to look for additional investments of a similar nature with the view of having them dominate my portfolios. I have been impressed by the power of steadily increasing dividends coupled with stock prices which have exceeded handily, the ravages of inflation.

Here are a few characteristics I look for: low debt, strong cash flow, a wide “moat” against competition, superb management, an internationally diverse market base with exposure to emerging markets, an easy-to-understand business model, a steadily increasing record of regularly paid dividends. I find that the value approach is perhaps, the most useful technique to use in ferreting out potential investments.

The Lesson

  • The power of steadily increasing, regular dividends is impressive and can shield you during down times in the market.
  • While sales may decline slightly during market downturns, they recover quickly thereafter as they are focused on meeting basic needs.
  • There are few companies of this nature. This facilitates the selection process.

I have written at length about stock screeners and especially, about those which can assist you in identifying great dividend paying companies. (See Stock Screeners.) You need only read the writings of Warren Buffet and the Investment Zoo by Stephen Jarislowsky to get a great start.

Speculation Can Be Rewarding

I have made impressive gains by speculating, mainly in mining companies. The key was in identifying a trend backed by a good story and in getting in early but not too early. In my early ventures, I made the mistake of getting overly greedy and over-confident and not taking profits ... or at least, managing my gains. The breakthrough came as a result of reading more about the industry and about speculation.

I hit the mother-load with Reminiscences of a Stock Operator, a remarkable book about Jesse Livermore, one of America's most successful speculators. With maturity, Livermore started to speculate on trends as opposed to the daily/hourly market action (although his skill in reading markets undoubtedly contributed to his success). I cannot “put a finger” on Livermore's approach as it is only acquired by repeated reading, creative dreaming, and practical experience. If you want the short hand version of Livermore to get you started, there is no better place than this:

The Lesson

  • Read voraciously to identify a trend.
  • Learn all you can about the trend (who, what, where, when ... and most important ... why).
  • Manage your risk by betting only what you are prepared to lose and temper the size of your bet according to your perception of risk.
  • Develop a system and maintain your discipline.
  • Recognize that “windows for speculation” for most retail investors are not all that common. Look for manias.

I find that situations for speculation come up about once every two years. By no means do I regard this activity as anything but a sideline to my mainline investing activity. This said, I am working on “new boat” fund ... but unless I am really lucky, the new boat won't float for many years, if then.


Thursday, 21 February 2013

Lessons Learned From Losses


As part of my recent portfolio review, I assessed my losing “investments” of the past eight years. My losses can be attributed to one or more of the following themes: 

Falling for a Fad and Investing in Countries Without the Rule of Law

Several years ago, I threw money at several Canadian-listed companies with operations based in China. The “story” was good: a rapidly expanding economy; seemingly limitless horizons for new ventures; management well-versed in the intricacies of doing business in China.

The reality was quite different:

  • There was outright fraud with one of them (Sino-Forest) and, I suspect, two others which I will not mention for reasons of liability.
  • Another had a poorly focused business plan and weak management. (Its recent share action would suggest some underhanded activity, but it's difficult to prove.)
  • In the competition to get new listings, stock exchanges did not exercise a high level of due diligence with the result that investors suffered ... but not the underwriters ...
  • I suspect that the “overhead” costs associated with doing business with state companies created an “unaccountable” and unsustainable drag on businesses – something which never appears in company financials .

Fortunately, I limited my losses by limiting my initial investment in these beasts. 

The Lessons

I learned not to invest in companies with most of their operations in countries without the rule of law. 

I also learned not to invest in “fads” unless I was prepared to speculate. 

I will never invest in Chinese companies listed on North American exchanges.


Uncritical Acceptance of the Thinking of Others

I placed a bet on Apex Silver after learning that George Soros had a very substantial stake in the company. It was literally a dry hole. Development fell off the rails due to a lack of water. There was no silver lining to this story other than a lesson learned.

I also invested in a fracking company after a writer who I respected noted that he had invested very heavily in the company. I should have done my homework. A review of the company's financials, its field operations, and its competitors would have led me to reach a different conclusion.

In both instances, I acted precipitously and did not do my own due diligence. As an added injury, I threw more money at those companies than normal in my state of “suspension of disbelief”.


The Lesson

I will think for myself and do my own due diligence. To misquote The Great Communicator: “Do not trust ... and if you're tempted ... verify.”

And, if I do succumb, I will manage risks in smaller, fledgling enterprises by restricting the size of my investment.


Bad Luck with Timing

Polaris Minerals had everything going for it: a great reserve of high quality aggregate, access to low cost transportation to major markets etc. However, it was crushed by the collapse of the housing boom in the U.S. Had I invested five years later, I would have made out like a bandit. This stock has yet room to rise from the pits. Waterfurnace is another example of a company caught by the housing boom collapse and the continued low cost of energy in the U.S. caused, in part, by the widespread implementation of new technologies. Some of the infrastructure companies were hurt by government budget woes and the fallout from the recent (ongoing?) recession.

Most of these companies have experienced recent gains in excess of market indices in recent months and I am now above water with several of them.

The Lesson

I will not panic.  Instead, I will test my investing thesis and if it still holds, I will maintain my positions for the long haul.  If, however, there are fundamental changes (e.g. technological obsolescence, gross malfeasence, unresolvable technical issues etc.) I will exit my position without regret. 

I will I invest in solid, well-managed companies with very low debt and whose businesses are focused on enduring needs. They should be able to weather transitory external events such as downturns in housing markets.

Now ... if I had only taken that approach with Cemex. Out of interest, I continued following the company and discovered that had I maintained my position, I would have gained something like 30 percent.


Leaving the Party Too Late

There's money to be made from the manias which infect markets from time to time: uranium, gold, rare earth minerals, fuel cells, etc.  Initially, I made a lot of money on uranium - everything was rosy.  By not taking profits and moving on, I was exposed to some significant losses.  Further, I got complacent and did not monitor my stakes closely with the result that I ended up losing money. My losses with uranium are not likely to be made up any time soon as many of the companies were small, speculative ventures based on "potential" but not on earnings.  

The experience did not deter me from exploiting the potential of manias, but it did alter my approach.  I wrote about this with respect to my venture with rare earth minerals a few years ago.  It was profitable. 

The Lessons

I will look actively for manias.

I will not confuse speculation with long-term investing. 

I will develop an exit strategy before establishing my positions.  



Further Readings 

Investing is largely a matter of managing one's self.  To date, I have not found much useful information in the field of behavioural investing theory, although the writings of James Montier are about the best it gets.  You can access his most recent pieces here:

He is a brilliant writer with much to say.  

The most insightful thinking, to my mind, is present in two books: The Investment Zoo about Stephen Jarislowsky; and, Reminiscences of a Stock Operator about Jesse Livermore.  The first book sets out the credo of one of Canada's most successful money managers - someone who adopted a pragmatic approach to maximize gains while minimizing losses, and importantly, one who had a duty to others.  In contrast, Livermore, one of the most successful (for a while) investors ever, invested for himself.  These books are well worth reading several times.

Despite their differences, the men shared a few things in common:
  • the discipline to follow a system; 
  • a facility with figures and a good memory;
  • a willingness to learn from mistakes;
  • an insatiable interest in learning;
  • the good sense to depart from the norm and not be held slave to their system.


In a future article, I will report on my successes and lessons learned.  






Sunday, 17 February 2013

The Financial Log Book - February 15, 2013

The Financial Log Book as of February 15, 2013


The New Year is off to a fine start. A more detailed commentary will be provided in the next full edition of The Financial Passage Maker



Entity Initial Price/ Purchase Date Price
2013-02-15
Gain/Loss
year to date
%
Gain/Loss
Since Purchase
%
Central Fund of Canada (CEF.A)
9.77
2007-09-04
20.3
-2.7
107.8
Silver Wheaton
(SLW)
12.37
2007-09-04
35.37
-1.4
185.9
Polaris Minerals (PLS)
10.70
2007-06-01
0.96
-4
-91.3
MEG Energy
(MEG)
44.19
2010-12-29
34.49
13.3
-21.9
Cenovus (CVE)
32.39
2010-07-27
32.17
-3.4
-0.68
Canam Group
(CAM)
6.23
2008-12-11
6.75
12.9
4.5
Canadian National Railway (CN)
48.88
2009-04-14
100.59
11.4
108.5
World Fuel Services (INT)
34.10 *
2009-04-14
44.62
8.5
161.7
North West Company (NWF)
16.23
2009-05-07
23.15
4.6
42.6 **
Powell Industries (POWL)
36.75
2009-11-12
59.16
42.5
61
Waterfurnace Renewable Energy (WFI)
28.62
2010-04-12
16.8
16.3
-41.3
Exploration Orbite (ORT.A)
3.24
2011-03-28
2.21
-9.1
-31.8
ABB (ABB-N)
20.18
2012-12-13
22.75
12.6
12.7
Oceaneering International
(OII-N)
52.95
2012-12-13
63.54
19.9
20
Deere & Company (DE)
88.07
2013-01-03
89.75
1.9
1.9
Rocky Mountain Dealerships (RME)
11.89
2013-01-03
12.05
1.5
1.3
HollyFrontier (HFC)
47.95
2013-01-28
55.55
15.8
15.8

* INT was split 1:2 on 2009-12-08
** NWF Gain/Loss calculation has been corrected from previous edition. It is now much lower ... but still nice ... especially when dividends are considered.










Friday, 8 February 2013

Stock Screeners - Great tools but only the first step in a journey


Stock Screeners – Great tools but the only first step in a journey

In the last edition, I mentioned a book entitled, Big Safe Dividends. It is supported by a web site which offers a regularly updated screener. (You have to register free to access the site.)

This led me to investigate other stock screeners.

The Little Book That Beats the Market (John Wiley & Sons, 2010) by Joel Greenblat is another of the Little Book series. It advances a simple but effective approach to establishing and managing a portfolio. I recommend this book. Visit his web site to learn more.

I was tempted, initially, to present a detailed discussion of selected stock screeners based on various analytical methods. However, in researching further, I came across a very interesting compendium of 75 screeners compiled by The American Association of Independent Investors. (I recently joined the AAII in order to have more complete access to the site's offerings.)

The AAII maintains a very rich site. The section on screeners is informative. For example, you can sort the screeners according to various metrics such as performance over 3, 5, and 10 year intervals. You can look at risk and compare their performance with a selection of market indices during bull and bear markets and various time intervals. In some parts of the site, you can look at the relative performance of screeners based on broad investment styles. Information on the relative risk of the style versus an assortment of market indices is also presented. In assessing the screens, you may wish to consider why some screeners performed better than others by comparing the worst to the best.

One of the methods based on Piotroski scores seemed to perform better than most other screeners. I looked for a Piotroski screener which includes Canadian stocks and found this (it includes listings from Europe and the U.S. as well). http://www.grahaminvestor.com/screens/piotroski-scores/

I especially like the sorting feature which enables users to array companies in various ways: alphabetical order, by sector, etc. Kudos to John B Keown who pens The Graham Investor: Intelligent Value Investing blog. Unfortunately, the last post in his blog is dated October, 2011. The screener is still active. If you use it, you may wish to e-mail him to thank him for his excellent work.

The following article, Stock Screening With Walter Schloss, provides a very nice synopsis of the approach adopted by one of America's most successful investors. You could build up a nice screen using these criteria and employ the methodology as part of your due diligence once you have identified potential purchases. http://www.aaii.com/computerized-investing/article/stock-screening-with-walter-schloss

For more on Walter Schloss, read Walter Schloss' 16 Factors to Make Money in the Stock Market. I'm going to revise my investing checklist as a result of Piotroski and Schloss and may present it in a future edition. (In a previous edition I commented on the value of checklists.) http://www.marketfolly.com/2012/10/walter-schloss-16-factors-needed-to.html

Screeners are useful as screening tools to identify candidates for further investigation. I generally use them to assist in the identification of potential companies once I have identified a sector of interest using a top down strategic approach.  

In order to realize their full value, you must undertake follow-up work to ascertain the “story” behind the metrics of the stock screens. As noted in earlier editions of The Financial Passage Maker, it is advisable to have a checklist to assist with your evaluation of potential acquisitions. The checklist should be consistent with your investment style (see The Little Book That Beats the Market). Over time, I have developed two checklists: one for growth stocks where I seek capital gains; one for dividend stocks.

I thought of developing one for speculative investments, but here again, this work has been done. In this regard, there's no better book than Reminiscences of a Stock Operator by Edwin Lefevre: John Wiley & Sons, 1994. I revisit it every three years or so ... it's that good. The book is themed on the experience of one of the most famous speculators in America in the 1920's and 1930's. The essence of Jesse Livermore's approach is set out here (an excellent site): http://www.jesse-livermore.com

Never before have investors enjoyed such wide access to investment tools and sources of information. However, with this wealth of data and information, why is it then, that most investors (including most “professionals”) under perform the market?
  • Most have very short time horizons and are unduly influenced by monthly/yearly swings in the market;
  • Most do not have the patience to wait until “undervalued” stocks are finally recognized by Mr. Market (this is the case especially with the value approach);
  • Many are seduced by fads (e.g. the dot com mania; housing; uranium; exotic ETFs ... tulips) and party on to financial oblivion i.e. they think they are “investing” instead of speculating, which is an entirely different game;
  • Many, especially institutional investors, are torpedoed by institutional constraints e.g. personal performance measures such as quarterly/yearly gains or losses on managed portfolios sometimes cause portfolio managers to act in strange ways;
  • Some institutional investors are over confident. Further, expressions of self doubt or hesitation in such a competitive environment do not fit in well with the prevailing culture of aggression;
  • Many overeducated investors cannot think out of the box. It seems as if the level of one's formal training equates inversely to one's ability to recognize patterns which don't fit one's preconceptions. I mentioned this in an earlier edition where secretaries outperformed highly educated mining geologists in a pattern recognition game;
  • The 24/7 financial news system creates undue “noise” which can influence susceptible individuals. Many of the “bingo callers” who blight the airwaves are not much more than lacquer-haired bimbos and bimbettes ... some of them may be good at interviews ... others may have a persona based on outlandish personal attributes ... but most of them are poor investors – otherwise – why would any person (other than a narcissist) turn up for work each day in such a crazy environment?); and,
  • In the final analysis, most people do not have the philosophical grounding and discipline to develop and follow a system (all great investors comment on this).
My advice:
  1. Accept personal responsibility for your financial well being. You alone will act in your own self interest. Others will generally put their interests before yours.

  2. For the equities component of your portfolio, you may wish to give serious consideration to investing in pure market indices via ETFs. You will outperform most active investment vehicles over time and the outrageous management fees and other charges associated with mutual funds will not erode your returns. Anyone can do this. For more information, read this interview with John Bogel. http://www.advisorone.com/2012/09/25/how-john-bogle-really-sees-etfs

  3. Read all you can about various investment approaches and determine those approaches which best fit your constitution. For example, if you are not prepared to go against the herd, the value approach is not for you – best to invest in market indices.
  1. Be prepared to work: become financially literate; invest time in learning and monitor your investments. Those “magical” systems which promise outlandish returns with little effort are usually the products of shysters seeking to line their pockets.

  2. Prepare checklists to assist in the initial identification of potential stocks and your subsequent follow-up investigations (the checklists may be different). I maintain a “watch list” of potential acquisitions in order to get a “feel” for the market and also, to provide a list of replacement candidates for shares sold. This lessens the temptation to jump in quickly with new purchases.

  3. Develop a “life plan” to provide a context for things financial. That way, you will be more motivated. I have devoted a lot of space to this topic in previous editions.
  4. Know yourself.

  5. Exercise discipline and stay the course.